Giveth
Giveth GIVbacks reward eligible donations through a raffle
Giveth GIVbacks give eligible donors a chance to receive GIV tokens through a weighted raffle. Donation value and the recipient project's GIVpower position influence participation weight. Eligibility doesn't promise a payout: selection determines who receives rewards, and the donation remains a contribution to the project.
Eligible donation selection and an incompatible token
Reward eligibility requires a qualifying project and an eligible donation token. A token the project accepts can still fall outside the rewards program, which needs reliable pricing data. The donation interface identifies eligible tokens.
Before submitting a donation intended to enter the raffle, check these conditions:
- The recipient has GIVbacks Eligible status.
- The selected token carries the eligibility indicator on the chosen network.
- The donation's amount and submission time meet the applicable round's entry conditions.
- The contribution is genuine, without goods or services offered in exchange, and isn't sent from a GIVbacks Eligible project's address.
- You would still fund the project without a raffle prize.
With those prerequisites satisfied, submit the donation through Giveth and confirm its transaction record. Compare the recorded recipient, token and amount with the intended contribution. That confirms payment; check the round's published raffle-entry records separately to confirm participation.
If the token lacks the eligibility indicator before submission, choose an eligible option or proceed without expecting entry. A completed transfer alone doesn't establish GIVbacks eligibility.
Project approval and reward eligibility
GIVbacks Eligible status adds a public-good assessment to project verification. A Verified badge alone doesn't establish the separate rewards status. The distinction matters when choosing between projects that both appear legitimate.
Eligibility approval examines demonstrated activity, reputation and public benefit. It doesn't replace the donor's judgment about the project's work. Read the proposed use of funds alongside the badge, especially when a project's description or activities have changed.
Donation value and project rank shape ticket weight
A donation's USD value and its recipient's GIVbacks factor determine its relative raffle weight. The raffle design multiplies those inputs, so larger eligible contributions carry more weight when the project factor stays equal.
The same relationship explains how project selection affects participation. An equal-value donation to a project with a higher applicable factor carries greater weight. That factor measures an input to the raffle; it doesn't specify the donor's eventual payment.
Relative weight also requires a denominator: the other eligible entries in that round. Your contribution alone cannot establish the complete chance of selection.
A displayed percentage doesn't promise a rebate
The project's GIVbacks percentage feeds the raffle calculation. Treating it as a cashback rate would turn a chance of winning into an expected reimbursement.
The raffle replaced the earlier approach of distributing proportional rewards among donors. Its outcomes therefore differ: an eligible donor can receive no prize, while a selected donor receives an allocation under the round's prize structure.
A percentage attached to a project cannot answer how much GIV your wallet will receive. Neither can a previous winner's reward establish your next outcome.
Choose an amount you intend the project to keep, then treat the raffle as a separate possible benefit. Increasing the contribution increases the amount given whether or not the draw selects it.
Monthly rounds replaced the earlier cadence
Giveth moved the raffle to a monthly schedule beginning in February 2026. The completed governance update also established selection of unique winners, with tickets determining their relative chances.
The applicable round announcement supplies its dates and prize configuration. Older descriptions of fortnightly draws belong to an earlier schedule. A round's closing time and the later availability of rewards are separate events, so the closing date alone doesn't establish when a claim becomes available.
GIVpower influences the recipient's factor
GIVpower lets participants boost projects, affecting their ranking and visibility. That ranking also contributes to the factor used in donor reward calculations.
Boosting and donating are distinct actions. A project's accumulated support can influence a donor's raffle weight without the donor personally controlling that support. The factor associated with the donation matters more than an assumption about where the project will rank later.
Staking or locking GIV introduces separate commitments. Donors don't need to stake or lock GIV to enter the donation raffle.
Review can exclude an otherwise recorded donation
Post-round review examines activity that can disqualify projects or donations. Prohibited arrangements include exchanging goods or services for contributions and circulating existing donations to generate rewards.
Misuse of funds relative to the project's stated purpose can also affect eligibility. A successful payment proves the transfer occurred; it doesn't settle these program conditions. Donations from GIVbacks Eligible project addresses to eligible projects also fall under an exclusion.
Winning and claiming are separate events
A winning allocation becomes claimable after review and distribution. The claim belongs to the donor address on the applicable reward network, which can differ from the donation network.
The claimable balance establishes what the address can harvest. If the balance is missing, check the draw result, distribution status, selected network and previous harvests. A harvest elsewhere in the GIVeconomy may already have claimed the liquid GIVbacks on that network. Repeating the donation doesn't repair an absent reward allocation.
GIVstream changes when rewards become liquid
GIVstream separates an immediately liquid reward portion from tokens released over time. Winning a stated amount of GIV therefore doesn't necessarily make the entire allocation immediately transferable.
The GIVstream release schedule ends on December 23, 2026. Its liquid share increases toward that endpoint. The split depends on the schedule's progress, so an old example's liquid percentage shouldn't become a permanent expectation for new rewards.
A GIVbacks distribution automatically records the increase in the recipient's GIVstream flowrate in the history table. The allocation record and the amount currently available to claim describe different aspects of the same reward.
Prize size and donation cost answer different questions
A raffle prize describes the tokens allocated to a winner. Donation cost describes what the donor commits before knowing that outcome. Subtracting a possible prize from the contribution would understate the amount the donor may ultimately give.
The number of tickets also isn't a cash balance. It expresses participation in a draw, with the outcome affected by other entries and the selection rules. More tickets increase the chance of selection when other entries stay the same, without creating a fixed repayment.
The decision changes when the gift requires repayment
GIVbacks fit a donation decision that remains acceptable without a prize. If receiving GIV is necessary to afford the contribution, raffle eligibility doesn't resolve that constraint.
Project support and possible donor rewards remain separate outcomes. A change in eligibility or prize configuration can change the reward opportunity; it doesn't convert the contribution into a repayable deposit.
Useful questions about Giveth GIVbacks
Does splitting a contribution automatically create more GIVbacks raffle weight?
Splitting an amount doesn't inherently increase its combined weight under the proportional weighting formula. With the same project factor, the parts sum to the same mathematical weight. Actual qualification still depends on each donation meeting the round's conditions, so splitting isn't a reliable way to improve participation.
Why can a GIVbacks harvest include more than the raffle reward?
A harvest can include other liquid GIV allocated to the same address on that network. The distribution contract collects liquid rewards across participating GIVeconomy mechanisms, including the GIVstream. The harvest breakdown therefore matters when reconciling the transaction with one raffle allocation.
Can an inactive project's GIVbacks Eligible badge expire?
An inactive project can lose its GIVbacks Eligible status. Maintaining eligibility requires project updates, so a badge seen during an earlier donation doesn't establish the status for a later contribution. Check the project's displayed eligibility when deciding whether a new donation should enter the raffle.
Must donors stake GIV before entering the GIVbacks raffle?
Personal GIV staking isn't the mechanism for entering the donation raffle. Eligible donations generate tickets, while project boosting influences their weight. Staking is a separate way to obtain GIVpower and support project ranking; it shouldn't be confused with a prerequisite for donating.
What happens to the GIVstream portion at the end of its release schedule?
The scheduled streaming portion becomes fully liquid when the GIVstream reaches its endpoint. That describes token availability under the existing release schedule, not a promise of further raffle allocations. Future reward programs or replacement distribution arrangements require their own terms.